The reader can compare the same question and answer before and after learning the concealed premise. The second pass changes the significance of Dick’s trust and Perry’s repeated claim, rather than providing a separate scene that merely resembles the first.
The two layers answer different questions: what the witness is depicted as saying in court, and what the book wants readers to consider beyond that exchange. The transition avoids silently relocating the longer explanation into the courtroom dialogue.
Repeating the device for a different answer shows why the status boundary matters: the supplement is not simply an expanded version of an affirmative answer. It supplies a reason the book says the hearing did not receive.
Reviewed examples have a source-linked editorial interpretation. Detected candidates are exact passages or structures retrieved by an explicit rule and still need interpretation. Neither label establishes a cause of bestseller longevity. No missing text is counted as a negative example.
